Categories:
Forum News
New Publication: Global Perspectives on Legal History 6
July 11, 2016
With "Spatial and Temporal Dimensions for Legal History. Research Experiences and Itineraries", the Max Planck Institute for
European Legal History presents volume 6 of its book series
"Global Perspectives on Legal History".
Global
Perspectives on Legal History is a book series edited and
published by the Max Planck Institute for European Legal History, Frankfurt am
Main, Germany.
As its title suggests, the series is designed to
advance the scholarly research of legal historians worldwide who seek to
transcend the established boundaries of national legal scholarship that
typically sets the focus on a single, dominant modus of normativity and law.
The series aims to privilege studies dedicated to reconstructing the historical
evolution of normativity from a global perspective.
It includes monographs, editions of sources, and
collaborative works. All titles in the series are available both as premium
print-on-demand and in the open-access format.
More information on the series and forthcoming volumes: http://global.rg.mpg.de
Massimo Meccarelli, María Julia Solla Sastre (eds.)
"Spatial and Temporal Dimensions for Legal History. Research Experiences and Itineraries"
Global Perspectives on Legal History 6
Frankfurt am Main: Max Planck Institute for European Legal History 2016. 300 p., € 14,99 D
ISBN: 978-3-944773-05-6
Open Access Online Edition: http://dx.doi.org/10.12946/gplh6
Print-on-demand: http://www.epubli.de/shop/buch/53894
The spatiotemporal conjunction is a fundamental aspect of the juridical reflection on the historicity of law. Despite the fact that it seems to represent an issue directly connected with the question of where legal history is heading today, it still has not been the object of a focused inquiry. Against this background, the book’s proposal consists in rethinking key confluences related to this problem in order to provide coordinates for a collective understanding and dialogue.
The aim of this volume, however, is not to offer abstract methodological considerations, but rather to rely both on concrete studies, out of which a reflection on this conjunction emerges, as well as on the reconstruction of certain research lines featuring a spatiotemporal component.
This analytical approach makes a contribution by providing some suggestions for the employment of space and time as coordinates for legal history. Indeed, contrary to those historiographical attitudes reflecting a monistic conception of space and time (as well as a Eurocentric approach), the book emphasises the need for a delocalized global perspective. In general terms, the essays collected in this book intend to take into account the multiplicity of the spatiotemporal confines, the flexibility of those instruments that serve to create chronologies and scenarios, as well as certain processes of adaptation of law to different times and into different spaces.
The spatiotemporal dynamism enables historians not only to detect new perspectives and dimensions in foregone themes, but also to achieve new and compelling interpretations of legal history. As far as the relationship between space and law is concerned, the book analyses experiences in which space operates as a determining factor of law, e.g. in terms of a field of action for law. Moreover, it outlines the attempted scales of spatiality in order to develop legal historical research. With reference to the connection between time and law, the volume sketches the possibility of considering the factor of time, not just as a descriptive tool, but as an ascriptive moment (quasi an inner feature) of a legal problem, thus making it possible to appreciate the synchronic aspects of the ‘juridical experience’.
As a whole, the volume aims to present spatiotemporality as a challenge for
legal history. Indeed, reassessing the value of the spatiotemporal coordinates
for legal history implies thinking through both the thematic and methodological
boundaries of the discipline.